![]() To view full results for every survey question, please visit the Athlete Viewpoint portal or scroll down for a recap. Quality of Life (cost of living, schools, culture, geography) if all other factors were equal.Potential to become a ‘Power 5’ AD from each institution.Potential for success in non-revenue sports relative to Mountain West Conference peers.Potential for Men’s Basketball success relative to Mountain West Conference peers.Potential for Football success relative to Mountain West Conference peers.Perceptions about the quality of the institution’s brand.President, Trustees, C-Suite) in support of the athletic program Perceptions about institutional leadership (e.g.Perceptions about the ability to generate donor & corporate support for the athletics program.Athletics facilities relative to Mountain West Conference peers.The nine variables independently measured and utilized to determine the rankings include: ![]() The data was used to provide detailed insights about the potential for success at each school. ![]() Rather, it is an assessment of the opportunity generally through the eyes of both peers and aspirants to the position were it to become available.ĭozens of sitting Athletic Directors or executive-level administrators who currently are or could soon be a Mountain West Conference AD were invited to share feedback on each AD job in the league. It’s imperative to note the Athletic Department Power Index is not intended or developed to analyze the performance or potential of the current Athletic Director at the respective institutions. The Athletic Department Power Index will evaluate the desirability of Athletic Director jobs in every Division I conference across the country. ![]() The AthleticDirectorU Athletic Department Power Index, powered by Athlete Viewpoint, continues with a look at the Mountain West Conference. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |